US National Interest in the Middle East

Henry Thompson

 

The US military is involved in a worldwide perpetual police action due to failed Middle East policy.  It is time to rethink our national interest and foreign policy goals.  In exchange for a few million dollars of lobby spending, the US Congress gives Israel military aid in the billions of dollars.  The direct cost of this aid is a burden on taxpayers and the indirect cost is harmful US foreign policy.  Israel spends about 10% of its national income on its military and losing US aid would raise taxes about 10%. 

 

Another mistake is to support Arab oil sheiks in spite of their repressive governments.  One way or another, this feudalism will become a relic of the past.  The US and the world depend on the steady flow of oil but US economic interest in the Middle East is not overwhelming.  US firms have little direct investment in the Middle East, mostly in the oil industry but totaling only 5% of US investment in that industry.  The US has very little investment in Israel, mostly in banks and small scale manufacturing, and has more invested in the Netherlands Antilles. 

 

One rationalization for military aid to Israel is that it is the only democracy in the Middle East.  Around the world, more countries are adopting a US style of representative democracy.  The US should openly advocate democratic reform and eliminate foreign aid to countries in the Middle East.  The present national borders in the Middle East are the result of Western wars during the past century.  The people now in Israel and Palestine have mostly immigrated there since World War II.  With jets to the “Holy Land” the tourism stakes are high and the locals should be allowed to settle their borders.

 

These steps would redefine US national interest in the Middle East: 

·       End military aid to Israel 

·       Promote democracy and economic freedom in the Arab countries

·       Recognize Palestine