16. a. Using a financial calculator the price of the zero coupon
bond ($1000 face value) selling at a yield to maturity of 8% is $374.84
and that of the coupon bond is $774.84.
At a YTM of 9% the price of the zero coupon bond is $333.28
and that of the coupon bond is $691.79.
Zero coupon bond Actual % loss =
333.28 – 374.84374.84 = –.1109, an 11.09% loss
The percentage loss predicted by the duration-with-convexity
rule is:
Predicted % loss = [( –11.81) ?.01 +
0.5 ? 150.3 ??(0.01)2] = –.1106, an 11.06%
loss
Coupon bond Actual % loss = 691.79 – 774.84774.84
= –.1072, a 10.72% loss
The percentage error predicted by the duration-with-convexity
rule is:
Predicted % loss = [( –11.79) ??.01 +
0.5 ??231.2 ??(0.01)2]
= –.1063, a 10.63% loss
b. Now assume yield to maturity falls to 7%. The price
of the zero increases to $422.04, and the price of the coupon bond increases
to $875.91.
Zero coupon bond
Actual % gain = 422.04 – 374.84374.84
= .1259, a 12.59% gain
The percentage gain predicted by the duration-with-convexity
rule is:
Predicted % gain = [( –11.81) ??(–.01)
+ 0.5 ??150.3 ??(0.01)2 ]
= .1256, an 12.56% gain
Coupon bond
Actual % gain = 875.91 – 774.84774.84 =
.1304, a 13.04% gain
The percentage gain predicted by the duration-with-convexity
rule is:
Predicted % gain = [ (–11.79) ??(–.01)
+ 0.5 ??231.2 ??(0.01)2]
= .1295, a 12.95% gain
c. The 6% coupon bond -- which has higher convexity -- outperforms
the zero regardless of whether rates rise or fall. This can be seen
to be a general property by noting from the duration-with-convexity formula
that the duration effect on the two bonds due to any change in rates will
be equal (since their durations are equal), but the convexity effect, which
is always positive, will always favor the higher convexity bond.
Thus, if the yields on the bonds always change by equal amounts, as we
have assumed in this example, the higher convexity bond will always outperform
a lower convexity bond with equal duration and initial yield to maturity.
d. This situation cannot persist. No one will be willing
to buy the lower convexity bond if it always underperforms the other bond.
Its price will fall and its yield to maturity will rise. Thus, the
lower convexity bond will sell at a higher initial yield to maturity.
That higher yield is compensation for lower convexity. If rates change
by only a little, the higher yield-lower convexity bond will do better;
if rates change by a lot, the lower yield-higher convexity bond will do
better.
17. a. 4. b. 4.
c. 4 . d. 2.
18. a. The two risks are price risk and reinvestment rate risk.
The former refers to bond price volatility as interest rates fluctuate,
the latter to uncertainty in the rate at which coupon income can be reinvested.
b. Immunization means structuring a bond portfolio so that
the value of the portfolio (with proceeds reinvested) will reach a given
target level regardless of future changes in interest rates. This
is accomplished by matching both the values and durations of the assets
and liabilities of the plan. This may be viewed as a low risk bond
management strategy.
c. Duration matching is superior to maturity matching because
bonds of equal duration -- not maturity -- are equally sensitive to interest
rate fluctuations.
d. Simply match the face value and maturity of the zero
to the cash flow of the obligation. Zeros are ideal because they
pose no issue of reinvestment rate risk.
e. Contingent immunization allows for active bond management
unless and until the surplus funding in the account is eliminated because
of investment losses, at which point an immunization strategy is implemented.
Contingent immunization allows for the possibility of above-market returns
if the active management is successful.
19. The economic climate is one of impending interest rate increases.
Hence, we will want to shorten portfolio duration.
a. Choose the short maturity (2001) bond.
b. The Arizona bond likely has lower duration. Coupons
are about equal, but the Arizona yield is higher.
c. Choose the 15 3/8 coupon bond. Maturities are about
equal, but its coupon is much higher, resulting in lower duration.
d. The duration of the Shell bond will be lower if the
effect of the higher yield to maturity and earlier start of sinking fund
redemption dominates its slightly lower coupon rate.
e. The floating rate bond has a duration that approximates
the adjustment period, which is only 6 months.
20. a. This swap would have been made if the investor anticipated
a decline long-term interest rates and an increase in long-term bond prices.
The deeper discount, lower coupon 6 3/8% bond would provide more opportunity
for capital gains, greater call protection, and greater protection against
declining reinvestment rates at a cost of only a modest drop in yield.
b. This swap was probably done by an investor who believed
the 24 basis point spread in yield between the two bonds was too narrow,
and if it widened to a more normal level, either a capital gain would be
experienced on the Treasury note or a capital loss would be avoided on
the Phone bond, or both. It could also have been done by an investor
anticipating a decline in interest rates but who also wanted to maintain
high current coupon income and have the better call protection of the Treasury
note. The Treasury note would have unlimited potential for price
appreciation in contrast to the Phone bond which would be restricted by
its call price. Furthermore, if intermediate-term interest rates
instead were to rise, the price decline of the higher quality, higher coupon
Treasury note would likely be “cushioned” and the reinvestment return from
the higher coupons would likely be greater.
c. This swap would have been made if the investor were
bearish on the bond market. The zero coupon note would be extremely
vulnerable to an increase in interest rates since the yield to maturity,
determined by the discount at the time of purchase, is locked in.
This is in contrast to the floating rate note where interest is adjusted
by formula each six months to reflect the current return available on six-month
U.S. Treasury bills. The funds received in interest income on the
floating rate notes could be used at a later time to purchase long-term
bonds at more attractive yields.
d. These two bonds are similar in most respects other than
quality and yield. An investor who believed the yield spread between
Government and Al bonds was too narrow would have made the swap either
to take a capital gain on the Government bond or avoid a capital loss on
the Al bond. The increase in call protection after the swap would
not be a factor except under the most bullish interest rate scenarios.
The swap does, however, extend maturity another 8 years and yield to maturity
sacrifice is 169 basis points.
e. The principal differences between these two bonds are
the convertible feature of the Z mart bond and the yield and coupon advantage
and longer maturity of the Lucky Ducks debentures. The swap would
have been made if the investor believed some combination of the following:
First, that the appreciation potential of the Z mart convertible, based
primarily on the intrinsic value of Z mart common stock, was no longer
as attractive as it had been. Second, that the yields on long-term
bonds were at a cyclical high, causing bond portfolio managers who could
take A2-risk bonds to reach for high yields and long maturities either
to lock them in or take a capital gain when rates subsequently declined.
Third, while waiting for rates to decline, the investor will enjoy an increase
in coupon income. Basically, the investor is swapping an equity-equivalent
for a long- term corporate bond.
21. a. A manager who believes that the level of interest rates will
change should engage in a rate anticipation swap, lengthening duration
if rates are expected to fall, and shortening if rates are expected to
rise.
b. A change in yield spreads across sectors would call for an
intermarket spread swap, in which the manager buys bonds in the sector
for which yields are expected to fall and sells bonds in the sector for
which yields are expected to rise.
c. A belief that the yield spread on a particular instrument
will change calls for a substitution swap in which that security is sold
if its relative yield is expected to rise or is bought if its yield
is expected to fall compared to other similar bonds.
22. Choose the longer-duration bond to benefit from a rate decrease.
a. The Aaa-rated bond will have the lower yield to maturity and
the longer duration.
b. The lower-coupon bond will have the longer duration and more
de facto call protection.
c. Choose the lower coupon bond for its longer duration.
23. You should buy the 3-year bond because it will offer a 9% holding-period
return over the next year, which is greater than the return on either of
the other bonds.
Maturity: 1 year 2 years
3 years
YTM at beginning of year
7% 8%
9%
Beginning of year prices $1009.35 $1000.00 $974.69
Prices at year end (at 9% YTM) $1000.00 $ 990.83
$982.41
Capital gain –$
9.35 –$ 9.17 $ 7.72
Coupon $
80.00 $ 80.00 $ 80.00
1-year total $ return $ 70.65 $
70.83 $ 87.72
1-year total rate of return
7% 7.08%
9%
The 3-year bond provides the greatest holding period return.
24. The minimum terminal value that the manager is willing to accept
is determined by the requirement for a 3% annual return on the initial
investment. Therefore, the floor equals $1 million ?? (1.03)5 = $1.16
million. Three years after the initial investment, only two years
remain until the horizon date, and the interest rate has risen to 8%.
Therefore, at this time, the manager needs a portfolio worth $1.16 million/(1.08)2
= $.994 million to be assured that the target value can be attained.
This is the trigger point.
25. The answer depends on the nature of the long-term assets which
the corporation is holding. If those assets produce a return which
varies with short-term interest rates then an interest-rate swap would
not be appropriate. If, however, the long-term assets are fixed-rate financial
assets like fixed-rate mortgages then a swap might be risk-reducing. In
such a case the corporation would swap its floating-rate bond liability
for a fixed-rate long-term liability.
26. The speculator who believes interest rates will fall will want
to pay the floating rate and receive the fixed rate. The investor
will benefit if the short-term reference rate does in fact fall, resulting
in an increase in the net cash flow from the swap.
27. a. In an interest rate swap, one firm exchanges or "swaps" a fixed
payment for another payment that is tied to the level of interest rates.
One party in the swap agreement must pay a fixed interest rate on
the notional principal of the swap. The other party pays the
floating interest rate (typically LIBOR) on the same notional principal.
For example, in a swap with a fixed rate of 8% and notional principal of
$100 million, the net cash payment for the firm that pays the fixed and
receives the floating rate would be (LIBOR – .08) ? $100 million.
Therefore, if LIBOR exceeds 8%, the firm receives money; if it is less
than 8%, the firm pays money.
b. There are several applications of interest rate swaps.
For example, a portfolio manager who is holding a portfolio of long-term
bonds, but is worried that interest rates might increase, causing a capital
loss on the portfolio, can enter a swap to pay a fixed rate and receive
a floating rate, thereby converting the holdings into a synthetic floating
rate portfolio. Or, a pension fund manager might identify some money
market securities that are paying excellent yields compared to other comparable-risk
short-term securities. However, the manager might believe that such
short-term assets are inappropriate for the portfolio. The fund can
hold these securities and enter a swap in which it receives a fixed rate
and pays a floating rate. It thus captures the benefit of the advantageous
relative yields on these securities, but still establishes a portfolio
with interest-rate risk characteristics more like those of long-term bonds.
28. The firm should enter a swap in which it pays a 7% fixed rate and
receives LIBOR on $10 million of notional principal. Its total payments
will be as follows:
Interest payments on bond (LIBOR + .01) ???$10 million
par value
Net cash flow from swap (.07 – LIBOR) ??$10 million
notional principal
TOTAL .08 ??$10 million
The interest rate on the synthetic fixed-rate loan is 8%.
29. The maturity of the 30-year bond will fall to 25 years, and its
yield is forecast to be 8%. Therefore, the price forecast for the
bond is $893.25 [n = 25; i = 8; FV = 1000; PMT = 70].
At a 6% interest rate, the five coupon payments will accumulate to $394.60
after 5 years. Therefore, total proceeds will be $394.60 + $893.25
= $1,287.85. The 5-year return is therefore 1,287.85/867.42 = 1.485.
This is a 48.5% 5-year return, or 8.22% annually.
The maturity of the 20-year bond will fall to 15 years, and its
yield is forecast to be 7.5%. Therefore, the price forecast for the
bond is $911.73 [n = 15; i = 7.5; FV = 1000; PMT = 65.
At a 6% interest rate, the five coupon payments will accumulate to $366.41
after 5 years. Therefore, total proceeds will be $366.41 + $911.73
= $1,278.14. The 5-year return is therefore 1,278.14/879.50 = 1.453.
This is a 45.3% 5-year return, or 7.76% annually. The 30-year bond
offers the higher expected return.
CHAPTER 12: MACROECONOMIC AND INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
1. Expansionary (looser) monetary policy to lower interest rates would
help stimulate investment and expenditures on consumer durables.
Expansionary fiscal policy – lower taxes, higher government spending, increased
welfare transfers – would stimulate aggregate demand directly.
2. a. Gold Mining. Gold traditionally is viewed as a hedge against
inflation. Expansionary monetary policy may lead to increased inflation,
and thus could enhance the value of gold mining stocks.
b. Construction. Expansionary monetary policy
will lead to lower interest rates which ought to stimulate housing demand.
The construction industry should benefit.
3. A depreciating dollar makes imported cars more expensive and American
cars cheaper to foreign consumers. This should benefit the U.S. auto
industry.
4. Supply side economists believe that a reduction in income tax rates
will make workers more willing to work at current or even slightly lower
(gross-of-tax) wages. Such an effect ought to mitigate cost pressures
on the inflation rate.
5. a. The robotics process entails higher fixed costs and lower variable
(labor) costs. This firm therefore will perform better in a boom
and worse in a recession. For example, costs will rise less rapidly
than revenue when sales volume expands during a boom.
b. Because its profits are more sensitive to the
business cycle, the robotics firm will have the higher beta.
6. Deep recession: Health care (a non-cyclical industry)
Superheated economy: Steel production (cyclical industry)
Healthy expansion: Housing construction (cyclical but interest-rate
sensitive)
Stagflation: Gold mining (counter-cyclical)
7. a. Oil wells: Decline (Environmental pressures, decline in
easily-developed new oil fields)
b. Computer hardware: Consolidation
c. Computer software: Consolidation
d. Genetic engineering: Start-up
e. Railroads: Relative decline
8. a. General Autos. Pharmaceuticals are less of a discretionary
purchase than automobiles.
b. Friendly Airlines. Travel expenditure is more sensitive
to the business cycle than movie consumption.
10. The index of consumer expectations is a useful leading economic
indicator because if consumers are optimistic about the future they will
be more willing to spend money, especially on consumer durables, which
will increase aggregate demand and stimulate the economy.
11. Labor cost per unit is a lagging indicator because wages typically
start rising only well into an economic expansion. At the beginning
of an expansion, there is considerable slack in the economy and output
can expand without employers bidding up the price of inputs or the wages
of employees. By the time wages start increasing due to high demand
for labor, the boom period has already progressed considerably.
12. a. Because of its very low maturity (30 days), the rate of return
on the money market fund will be only slightly affected by changes in interest
rates. The fund might be a good place to "park" cash if you forecast
an increase in interest rates, especially given the high liquidity of such
funds. The $5,000 can be reinvested in longer-term assets after rates
increase.
b. If you are relatively neutral on rates, the one-year CD might
be a reasonable "middle-ground" choice. It will provides a higher
return than keeping your funds in the money market fund unless rates rise
considerably. On the other hand, it has far less interest rate risk
(that is, a much lower duration) than the 20-year bond, and therefore less
exposure to interest rate increases. c. The long-term bond
will be the best choice for an investor who wants to speculate on a decrease
in rates.
13. a. Relevant data items from the table that support the conclusion
that the retail auto parts industry as a whole is in the maturity phase
of the industry life cycle are:
1. The population of 18-29 year olds, a major customer base for
the industry, is gradually declining.
2. The number of households with the income less than $35,000,
another important consumer base, is not expanding.
3. The number of cars 5-15 years old, an important end market,
has experienced low annual growth (or actual declines in some years), so
the number of units that potentially need parts is not growing.
4. Automotive aftermarket industry retail sales have been growing
slowly for several years.
5. Consumer expenditures on automotive parts and accessories
have grown slowly for several years.
6. Average operating margins of all retail autoparts companies
have steadily declined.
b. Relevant items of data from the table that support the conclusion
that Wigwam Autoparts Heaven, Inc. (WAH) and its major competitors are
in the consolidation stage of their life cycle are: 1. Sales
growth of retail autoparts companies with 100 or more stores have been
growing rapidly and at an increasing rate.
2. Market share of retail autoparts stores with 100 or more stores
has been increasing but is still less than 20 percent, leaving room
for much more growth. 3. Average operating margins for retail
autoparts companies with 100 or more stores are high and rising.
Because of industry fragmentation (i.e., most of the market share is distributed
among many companies with only a few stores), the retail autoparts industry
apparently is undergoing marketing innovation and consolidation.
The industry is moving toward the “category killer” format, in which a
few major companies control large market shares through proliferation of
outlets. The evidence suggests that a new “industry within an industry”
is emerging in the form of “category killer” large chain-store company.
This industry subgroup is in its consolidation stage (i.e., rapid growth
with its high operating profit margins and emerging market leaders) despite
the fact that the industry is in the maturity stage of its life cycle.
14. a. The concept of an industrial life cycle refers to the tendency
of most industries to go through various stages of growth. The rate
of growth, the competitive environment, profit margins and pricing strategies
tend to shift as an industry moves from one stage to the next although
it is usually difficult to pinpoint exactly when one stage has ended and
the next begun. The initial start-up stage is characterized
by perceptions of a large potential market and by a high optimism for potential
profits. In this stage, however, there is usually a high rate of
failure. In the second stage, often called rapid growth or consolidation,
growth is high and accelerating, the markets are broadening, unit costs
are declining and quality is improving. In this stage, industry leaders
begin to emerge. The third stage, usually called mature growth, is
characterized by decelerating growth caused by such things as maturing
markets and/or competitive inroads by other products. Finally, an
industry reaches a stage of full maturity in which sales slow or even decline.
Product pricing, profitability and industry competitive structure
often vary by phase. Thus, for example, the first phase usually encompasses
high product prices, high costs (R&D, marketing, etc.) and a
(temporary) monopolistic industry structure. In phase two (rapid
expansion), new entrants begin to appear and costs fall rapidly due to
the learning curve. Prices generally don’t fall as rapidly, however,
allowing profit margins to increase. In phase three (mature growth),
growth begins to slow as the product or service begins to saturate the
market, and margins are eroded by significant price reductions. In
the final stage, industry cumulative production is so high that production
costs have stopped declining, profit margins are thin (assuming competition
exists), and the fate of the industry depends on the extent of replacement
demand and the existence of substitute products/services.
b. The passenger car business in the United States has probably
entered the final stage in the industrial life cycle because normalized
growth is quite low. The information processing business, on the
other hand, is undoubtedly earlier in the cycle. Depending on whether
or not growth is still accelerating or not, it is either in the second
or third stage.
c. Cars: in the final phases of the life cycle, demand
tends to be price sensitive. Thus, Universal can’t raise prices without
losing volume. Moreover, given the industry’s maturity, cost structures
are likely to be similar across all competitors, and any price cuts can
be matched immediately. Thus, Universal’s car business is boxed in:
Product pricing is determined by the market, and the company is a “price-taker.”
Idata: Idata should have much more pricing flexibility
given its earlier phase in the industrial life cycle. Demand is growing
faster than supply, and, depending on the presence and/or actions of an
industry leader, Idata may price high to maximize current profits and generate
cash for product development or price low in an effort to gain market share.
15. a. A basic premise of the business cycle approach to investing
is that stock prices anticipate fluctuations in the business cycle.
For example, there is evidence that stock prices tend to move about six
months ahead of the economy. In fact, stock prices are a leading
indicator for the economy.
Over the course of a business cycle this approach to investing
would work roughly as follows. As the top of a business cycle is
perceived to be approaching, stocks purchased should not be vulnerable
to a recession. When a downturn is perceived to be at hand, stock
holdings should be lightened with proceeds invested in fixed-income securities.
Once the recession has matured to some extent, and interest rates fall,
bond prices will rise. As it’s perceived the recession is about to
end, profits should be taken in the bonds and reinvested in stocks, particularly
those in cyclical industries with a high beta.
Abnormal returns generally will only be earned if these asset
allocation switches are timed better than those of other investors.
Switches made after the turning points may not lead to excess returns.
b. Based on the business cycle approach to investment timing,
the ideal time to invest in a cyclical stock like a passenger car company
would be just before the end of a recession. If the recovery is aleady
underway, Adam’s recommendation would be too late. The equities market
generally anticipates the changes in the economic cycle. Therefore,
since the “recovery is underway,” the price of Universal Auto should already
reflect the anticipated improvements in the economy.
16. a. Expected profit = Sales – fixed costs – variable
costs
= $120,000 – $30,000 – (1/3) ? $120,000 =
$50,000
b. DOL = 1 + fixed costsprofits = 1 +
$30,000$50,000 = 1.6
c. If sales are only $108,000, profits will fall to
$108,000 – $30,000 – (1/3) ??$108,000 = $42,000
which is a decline of 16% from the forecasted value.
d. The decrease in profits is 16%, which equals DOL times the
10% drop in sales.
e. Profits must drop more than 100% for earnings to turn negative.
For profits to fall 100%, sales must fall by 100%/DOL = 100%/1.6 = 62.5%.
Therefore, revenues would be only 37.5% of the original forecast.
At this level, sales will be .375 ? $120,000 = $45,000.
f. If sales are $45,000, profits will be: $45,000
– $30,000 – (1/3) ? $45,000 = $0
17. The expiration of its patent means that General Weedkiller will
soon face considerably greater competition from its competitors.
We would expect prices and profit margins to fall, and total industry sales
to increase somewhat as prices decline. The industry will probably
enter the consolidation stage in which producers are forced to compete
more extensively on the basis of price.
18. a. (4) b. (3) c.
(3) d. (2)
e. (4) f. (3)
g. (1)
CHAPTER 13: EQUITY VALUATION
1. (a) P = 2.10/.11 = 19.09
2. (c)
3. a. k = D1/P0 + g
.16 = 2/50 + g g =
.12
b. P0 = D1/(k – g) = 2/(.16 – .05)
= 18.18
The price falls in response to the more pessimistic dividend
forecast. The forecast for current earnings, however, is unchanged.
Therefore, the P/E ratio must fall. The lower P/E ratio is evidence
of the diminished optimism concerning the firm's growth prospects.
4. a. False. Higher beta means that the risk of the firm is higher
and the discount rate applied to value cash flows is higher. For
any expected path of earnings and cash flows the present value of the cash
flows, and therefore, the price of the firm will be lower when risk is
higher. Thus the ratio of price to earnings will be lower.
b. True. Higher ROE means more valuable growth opportunities.
c. Uncertain. The answer will depend on a comparison of
the expected rate of return on reinvested earnings versus the market capitalization
rate. If the expected rate of return on the firm's projects is higher
than the market capitalization rate, then P/E will increase as the plowback
ratio increases.
5. a. g = ROE ? ? b = 20% ?
.30 = 6%
D1 = $2(1 – b) = $2(1 – .30) =
$1.40
P0 = D1/(k – g) = $1.40/(.12 – .06)
= $23.33
P/E = 23.33/2 = 11.67
b. PVGO = P0 – EPS0k =
23.33 – 2.00.12 = $6.67
c. g = ROE ? b = 20%
? .20 = 4%
D1 = $2(1 – b) = $2(1 – .20) =
$1.60
P0 = D1/(k – g) = $1.60/(.12 – .04)
= $20
P/E = 20/2 = 10
PVGO = P0 – EPS0k =
20 – 2.00.12 = $3.33
6. a. g = ROE ? ? b = 16% ?
.5 = 8%
D1 = $2(1 – b) = $2.00 ? ?(1 – .5) = $1.00
P0 = D1/(k – g) = $1/(.12 – .08) = $25
b. P3 = P0(1 + g)3 = $24(1.08)3 = $31.49
7. a. E(r) = k = D1P0 + g
= .6020 + .08 = .11 = 11%
b. The model assumes that the dividend growth rate is forever
constant. Therefore, the model cannot be applied to firms that currently
do not pay dividends. Second, the model is inappropriate when g >
k (which presumably cannot persist indefinitely). Third, the model
cannot handle firms with variable dividend growth paths.
c. One can use either P/E multiples or market-to-book multiples
exhibited by other firms in the same industry.
8. a. This director is confused. In the context of
the constant growth model that P0 = D1/(k – g), it is true that price is
higher when dividends are higher holding everything else including dividend
growth constant. But everything else will not be constant.
If the firm raises the dividend payout rate, the growth rate g will fall,
and stock price will not necessarily rise. In fact if ROE >
k, price will fall.
b. An increase in dividend payout will reduce the sustainable
growth rate as less funds are reinvested in the firm. The sustainable
growth rate is ROE ??plowback, which will fall as plowback ratio falls.
The increased dividend payout rate will reduce the growth rate of book
value for the same reason -- less funds are reinvested in the firm.
9. a. k = 6 + 1.25(14 – 6) = 16% g = 6%
D1 = E0 (1 + g) (1 – b) = 3(1.06) (1/3) = 1.06
P0 = D1k – g = 1.06.16 – .06
= 10.60
b. Leading P0/E1 = 10.60/3.18 = 3.33
Trailing P0/E0 = 10.60/3.00 = 3.53
c. PVGO = P0 – EPS0k =
10.60 – 3.16 = – 8.15
The low P/E ratios and negative PVGO are due to a poor ROE,
9%, that is less than the market capitalization rate, 16%.
d. Now, you revise b to 1/3, g to 1/3 ? .09 = .03, and D1 to
E0 ? 1.03 ? 2/3 = 2.06. Thus, V0 = 2.06/(.16 – .03) = $15.85.
V0 increases because the firm pays out more earnings instead of reinvesting
them at a poor ROE. This information is not yet known to the rest
of the market.
10. Because ? = 1.0, k = market return, 15%.
Therefore 15% = D1/P0 + g = 4% + g
g = 11%
11. FI Corporation a. g = 5%; D1 = $8; k = 10%
P0 = D1k – g = $8.10 – .05 =
$160
b. The dividend payout ratio is 8/12 = 2/3, so the payout
ratio is b = 1/3. The implied value of ROE on future investments is found
by solving: g = b ? ROE with g = 5% and b = 1/3. ROE = 15%.
c. The price assuming ROE = k is just EPS/k. P0
= $12/.10 = $120. Therefore, the market is paying $40 per share ($160
– $120) for growth opportunities.
12. Three different valuation approaches for U.S. Tobacco Co.:
a. Balance sheet approaches: All of the asset-related
per share measures fall below the recent market price, and the stock therefore
is not attractive on this basis:
Recent Price $54.00
Book Value Per Share 12.10
Liquidation Value Per Share 9.10
Replacement Costs of Assets Per Share 19.50
b. Constant growth DDM approach: V0 = Dl/(k – g) = $2.10/(.13
– .10) = $70
Thus intrinsic value exceeds market price, and the stock is
attractive on this basis.
c. Earnings multiplier approach: If we apply the P/E multiplier
of the S&P 500 to U.S. Tobacco’s estimated EPS we get 23.2 ?
$4.80 = $111.36. This exceeds UST’s market price. (Equivalently,
UST's P/E ratio is only 11.3, which is considerably less than that of the
market.) If you believe that there is no reason for such a big disparity
in P/E multiples, you might conclude that the stock is underpriced by the
market.
13. High-Flyer stock.
a. k = rf + ? (kM – rf) = .10 + 1.5(.15 – .10) =
.10 + .075 = .175 g = .05.
Therefore, P0 = D1k – g =
$2.50.175 – .05 = $2.50.125 =
$20
14. a. k = 4% + 1.15 ? (10% – 4%) = 10.9%
b. Using Emmas's short term growth projections of 25%, we obtain
a two-stage DDM value as follows:
P0 = D11 + k
+ D2(1 + k)2 + D3(1 + k)3
+ D4 + D5/(k – g)(1 + k)4
= .2871.109 +
.3591.1092 + .4491.1093
+ .562 + .702/(.109 – .093)1.1094
= .259 + .292 + .329 + 29.378
= 30.258
c. With these new assumptions, Disney stock has an intrinsic
value below its market price of $37.75. This analysis indicates a
sell recommendation. Even though Disney's 5-year growth rate increases
so does its beta and risk premium. The intrinsic value falls.
15. a. It is true that NewSoft sells at higher multiples of earnings
and book value than Capital Corp. But this difference may be justified
by NewSoft's higher expected growth rate of earnings and dividends.
NewSoft is in a growing market with abundant profit and growth opportunities.
Capital Corp is in a mature industry with fewer growth prospects.
Both the price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios will reflect the prospect
of growth opportunities, implying that the ratios for these firms ratios
do not necessarily imply mispricing.
b. The most important weakness of the constant-growth dividend
discount model in this application is that it assumes forever constant
growth rate of dividends. While dividends may be on a steady growth
path for Capital Corp, which is a more mature firm, that is far less likely
to be a realistic assumption for NewSoft.
c. NewSoft should be valued using a multi-stage DDM, which allows
for rapid growth in the early years, but that recognizes that growth ultimately
must slow to a more sustainable rate.
16. Stock
A B
Market capitalization rate, k 10% 10%
Expected return on equity, ROE 14% 12%
Estimated earnings per share, E1 $2.00 $1.65
Estimated dividends per share, D1 $1.00 $1.00
Current market price per share, P0 $27 $25
a. Dividend payout ratio, 1 – b .50 .606
b. Growth rate, g = ROE ? b 7% 4.728%
c. Intrinsic value, V0 $33.33 $18.97
d. Stock A is the one you would invest in since its intrinsic
value exceeds its price. You might want to sell short stock B.
17. Tennant Company
D0 = $.96 E0 = $1.85 ROE = 1.85/13.07 = .142
Dividend payout = .96/1.85 = .519
Plowback ratio = b = .481
g = b ? ROE = .481 ? .142 = .068 = 6.8% per year.
k = 7% + 5% = 12% per year
a. V0 = D1k – g = .96 ? 1.068.12
– .068 = $19.72
b. If ROE = 20% and b = .65 then g = 13% per year, which is greater
than k. Whenever g > k, the constant growth rate DDM is meaningless since
it gives a negative value for the value of the stock. You would therefore
need to try a multistage DDM.
18. Nucor Corporation Stock Price (Dec. 30,
1997) $53.00
1998 Estimated Earnings $ 4.25 1998 Estimated
Book Value $25.00
Indicated Dividend $ 0.40 Beta 1.10
Risk-Free Return 7.0% High Grade Corporate Bond Yield
9.0%
Risk Premium -- Stocks over Bonds 5.0%
a. The expected return on the stock market is the bond yield
plus the risk premium of stocks over bonds: E(rM) = 9% + 5%
= 14%
b. First we must calculate ROE in order to find g.
ROE is the estimated EPS divided by estimated book value:
ROE = 4.25/25 = .17 = 17%
Dividend payout = .40/4.25 = .094
b = 1 – .094 = .906
g = b ? ROE = .906 ? 17% =
15.4% per year
Implied total return = Dividend yield + g
= .40/53 + .154 = .0075
+ .154
= .162 or 16.2% per year
c. Required return = rf + ? [E(rM) – rf] =
7% + 1.1(14% – 7%)
= 14.7% per year
d. Nucor’s implied total return exceeds the required return
using the CAPM. This suggests that its stock is undervalued, and it is
an attractive investment.
19. Nogro Corporation
a. P0 = $10, El = $2, b =
.5, ROE = .2
k = D1/P0 + g D1 =
$1 g = b * ROE =
.10 Therefore, k = $1/$10 + .10 =
.10 + .10 = .20 or 20%
b. Since k = ROE, the NPV of future investment opportunities
is zero:
PVGO = P0 – EPS0k = 10 –
10 = 0
c. Since k = ROE, the stock price would be unaffected by
cutting the dividend and investing the additional earnings.
Again, this should have no impact on the stock’s price since
the NPV of the investments would be zero.
20. Xyrong Corporation
a. k = 8% + 1.2(15% – 8%) = 16.4%
g = b * ROE = .6 ? 20%
= 12%
V0 = D0(1 + g)k – g = $4 ? 1.12.164 – .12 = $101.82
b. P1 = V1 = V0(1 + g) = $114.04
E(r) = D1 + P1 – P0P0 = $4.48 + $114.04 – $100$100
= .1852 = 18.52%
CHAPTER 14: FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
1. ROA = ROS * ATO. The only way that Crusty Pie can have an
ROS higher than the industry average and an ROA equal to the industry average
is for its ATO to be lower than the industry average.
2. ABC’s asset turnover must be above the industry average.
3. ROE = (1 – tax rate)[ROA + (ROA ? Interest rate)Debt/Equity]
ROEA > ROEB Firms A and B have the same ROA.
Assuming the same tax rate, they must have different interest rates and/or
debt ratios.
4. (c) Old plant and equipment is likely to have a low net book
value, making the ratio of sales to net fixed assets higher.
5. The current ratio will increase. The equal reduction in current
assets and current liabilities will have a larger proportionate impact
on current liabilities, and therefore the ratio of current assets to current
liabilities will rise.
Turnover will rise. Sales should remain unaffected, but
assets are lower.
6. (d). Lower dividend payouts will result in higher retained
earnings and higher growth.
7. ROE = Net profitsequity = 5.5% ? 2 ? 1/.6 = 18.3%.
8. Par value 20,000 ? $20 = $ 400,000
Additional paid in capital 5,000,000
Addition to RE during year
70,000
Book value of equity $5,470,000
Book value per share = 5470,000/20,000 = $273.50
9. (2) (The numerator in (c) equals the total return to all security
holders, so the ratio equals return on total assets.)
10. a. Palomba Pizza Stores Statement of Cash Flows
For Year Ended December 31,2001
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash Collections from Customer $250,000
Cash Payments to Suppliers (85,000)
Cash Payments for Salaries (45,000)
Cash Payments for Interest (10,000)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $110,000
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Sale of Equipment 38,000
Purchase of Equipment (30,000)
Purchase of Land (14,000)
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities
(6,000)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Retirement of Common Stock (25,000)
Payment of Dividends (35,000)
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities
(60,000)
Net Increase in Cash
44,000
Cash at Beginning of Year 50,000
Cash at End of Year $94,000
b. The cash flow from operations (CFO) focuses on measuring the
cash flow generated by operations and not on measuring profitability.
If used as a measure of performance, CFO is less subject to distortion
than the net income figure. Analysts use the CFO as check on quality
of earnings. The CFO then becomes a check on the reported net earnings
figure but not as a substitute for net earnings. Companies with high
net income but low CFO may be using income recognition techniques that
are suspect. The ability of a firm to generate cash from operations
on a consistent basis is one indication of the financial health of the
firm. For most firms, CFO is the “life blood” of the firm.
Analysts search for trends in CFO to indicate future cash conditions and
the potential for cash flow troubles.
Cash flow from investing activities (CFI) is an indication of
how the firm is investing its excess cash. The analyst must consider
the ability of the firm to continue to grow and expand activities and CFI
is a good indication of the attitude of management in this area.
Analysis of this component of total cash flow indicates the type of capital
expenditures being made by management to either expand or maintain productive
activities. CFI is also an indicator of the firm’s financial flexibility
and ability to generate sufficient cash to respond to unanticipated needs
and opportunities. A decreasing CFI may be a sign of a slowdown in
growth of the firm.
Cash flow from financing (CFF) presents the feasibility of financing,
the sources of financing, and an indication of the types of sources management
supports. Continued debt financing may signal a future cash flow
problem. The dependency of a firm on external sources of financing
(either borrowing or equity financing) may present troubles in the future
such as debt servicing and maintaining dividend policy. Analysts
also use CFF as an indication of the quality of earnings. It offers
insights into the financial habits of management and potential future policies.
11. Seattle Manufacturing Corp.
a. ROA = EBIT Assets = Net income
before tax + interest expenseAverage assets
= 64.8 + 19.8.5(544.2 + 628)
= .144 or 14.4%
b. EPS = Net income – preferred dividendsNumber
of shares of common stock outstanding
Preferred dividends = .08 ? $25 ? 600,000 shares.
Therefore,
EPS = $54.4 million – $1.2 million.5(2.68
million + 3 million) shares = $18.73
c. Acid test ratio = Cash + commercial paper + receivablesCurrent
liabilities
= $6.6 + 15 + 93.2$224.4 = .51
d. Interest coverage ratio = EBIT
Interest expense = $64.8 + $19.8$19.8
= 4.3
e. Receivables collection period = Average receivablesSales
365 = .5(77 + 93.2)1207.6 365
= 25.7 days
f. Leverage ratio = Average assetsAverage common
equity
Common equity(1997) = $30 + 27 + 58.8 = $115.8 million
Common equity(1996) = $26.8 + 26.4 + 51 = $104.2 million
Leverage ratio = .5(544.2 + 628).5(104.2
+ 115.8) = 5.33?
12. Chicago Refrigerator Co.
a. Quick Ratio = Cash + receivablesCurrent liabilities
= $325 + $3599$3945 = .99
b. ROA = EBITAssets
= Net income before tax + interest expenseAverage assets
= $2259 + 78.5($8058 + 4792)
= .364 or 36.4%
c. ROE = Net income – preferred dividendsAverage
common equity
Preferred dividends = .1 ? $25 ? 18,000 =
$45,000
Common equity in 1997 = $829 + 575 + 1,949
= $3,353 million
Common equity in 1996 = $550 + 450 + 1,368
= $2,368 million
ROE = Net income – preferred dividendsAverage common
equity = $1265 – 45.5(3353 + 2368) =
.426 = 42.6%
d. Earnings per share = $1265 – $45.5(829 + 550)
= $1.77 per share
e. Profit margin = EBITSales =
$2259 + 78$12065 = .194 = 19.4%
f. Times interest earned = EBITInterest expense
= $2259 + 78$78 = 30
g. Inventory turnover = Cost of goods soldAverage
inventory = $8048.5(1415 + 2423) =
4.19
h. Leverage ratio = Average assetsAverage common
equity = .5(4792 + 8058).5(2368 + 3353)
= 2.2
13. Atlas Corporation
a. Acid test ratio = Cash + commercial paper + receivablesCurrent
liabilities
= $3.3 + 46.6112.2
= .44
b. Inventory turnover = Cost of goods soldAverage inventory
= $475.6.5(125.6 + 143) = 3.54
c. EPS = Net income – preferred
dividendsNumber of shares of common stock outstanding
= $27.2.5(1.5 + 1.34)
= $19.15
d. Interest coverage = EBIT Interest expense
= $32.4 + $9.9$9.9 = 4.27
e. Leverage ratio = Average assetsAverage common
equity = .5(264.6 + 306.5).5(52.1 + 57.9)
= 5.19
14. a 15. a 16.
b
17. a. [FIFO during deflation means higher-historical-cost goods are
“taken out of inventory.” So accounting income is lower and assets
are lower.
18. c 19. c 20. b
CHAPTER 15: TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
1. The resistance level is established by the history of the
market reaching but failing to rise above a given price range. The
support level is established by the history of the market reaching but
failing to fall below a given price range.
2. Trin = Volume declining/Number decliningVolume advancing/Number
advancing
= 310,620/1,264548,016/1,781 = .799
This trin ratio, which is below 1.0, would be taken as a bullish signal.
3. Breadth:
Day Advances Declines
Net Adv Cumulative Breadth
Monday 1,403 1,615 ?242
?242
Tuesday 1,781 1,264 517
+275
Breadth is postive and increasing. This is a bullish signal
(although no one would actually use a two-day measure as in this example).
5. The confidence index rises from 8/9 = .889 to 9/10 = .90.
This would indicate slightly higher confidence. But the real reason
for the increase in the index is the expectation of higher inflation, not
higher confidence about the economy.
6. September 17: market is down from previous days, trading volume
is higher; thus, signal is bearish.
October 15: market is up, trading volume is high; signal is bullish.
November 5: market is down, trading volume is high; signal is
bearish.
January 5: market is up, trading volume is down slightly from
previous days, but still high; signal is bullish.
7. At the beginning of the period, the price of Computers, Inc. divided
by the industry index was 0.39; by the end of the period, the ratio had
increased to 0.50. As the ratio increased over the period, Computers,
Inc. appeared to be outperforming other firms in its industry. The
overall trend, therefore, indicates relative strength, although some fluctuation
existed during the period, with the ratio falling to a low point of 0.33.
8. Five day moving averages:
Days 1 – 5: (19.625 + 20 + 20.5 + 22 + 21.125) / 5 = 20.65.
Days 2 – 6 = 21.125 etc.
Days 10 – 14 = 23.15 ???Buy signal (day 10
price > moving average).
Days 11 – 15 = 22.50
Days 18 – 22 = 19.275 ??????Sell signal (day 18 price < moving
average).
10. This pattern shows a lack of breadth. Even though the index
is up, more stocks fell than rose, which indicates a “lack of broad-based
support” for the rise in the index.
11. The signal is bearish as cumulative breadth is negative;
however, the negative number is declining in magnitude, indicative of improvement.
Perhaps the worst of the bear market has passed.
12. Trin = Volume declining/Number decliningVol advancing/Num
advancing = 330 million/906240 million/704 = 1.07
This is a slightly bearish statistic, avg volume in declining
issues a bit greater than average volume in advancing issues.
13. Confidence Index = Yield on top rated corporate bondsYield
on intermediate grade corporate bonds
This year: Confidence Index = 8% / 9% = 0.89.
Last year: Confidence Index = 9% / 10% = 0.90.
Thus, the confidence index is decreasing.