Home || Introduction || Task || Process || Resources || Evaluation || Conclusion || Teacher Page

Evaluation Page

 

Scoring Rubric - 20 points possible

 
Teacher instruction - The first four criteria (16 points) on the Rubric are used to judge the entire group, the remaining (4) points will come from the individual work for each student.
 
Student Name________________
Date________________________
 
Assessment Page
4
3
2
1
Score

Sources

Incorporated a variety of credible sources beyond those provided by the instructor.
Utilized sources provided by the instructor, but did no further research.
Used only a
few of the sources provided by the instructor or used sources of questionable credibility.
Few or no sources listed.
Presentation

Presentation is clear, well prepared, and effectively explains group processes and outcome.

Presentation is reasonably clear, explains group processes and outcome, but fails to layout the clear pathway.
Presentation does not clearly link steps in process, but explains general ideas of the process.
Confusing, unorganized, and incomplete.
Group Dynamics
Group gathers and shares information completely, divides duties equally, shows great teamwork skills.
Group shares some information, divides duties almost equally, does not fully work together as a team.
Group shows unequal labor distribution, some disagreements, does not fully work together as a team.
Group does not work well together, has constant unresolved arguments.
Documentation
Accurate and informative notes, easily comprehended, all steps in process documented thoroughly and accurately.
Informative notes, mostly comprehensible, documented completely.
 
Maintained mostly incomprehensible notes, documentation incomplete.
Few or no notes, no process documentation.

Individual Scores-Only score one part below for the student
who was responsible for that part.

Water Chemist
Identified all 5 parameters, thorough research, worked well with waste remediation specialist, determined optimum range for selected fish.
Identified most of the parameters, communicated some with waste remediation specialist, determined a range for selected fish.
Identified a few of the parameters, talked to waste remediation specialist a couple of times, incorrect range for selected fish.
Identified two or less of the parameters, no contact with waste remediation specialist, no range specified for selected fish.
Nutritionist
Lots of research on what fish eat, identified 3 components of fish feed, develop optimum practical diet for selected fish.
Researched what fish eat, 3 components of fish feed, developed diet for selected fish.
Little research on what fish eat, 2 or less components of fish feed, poor diet designed for selected fish.
No research done, 1 or less components of fish feed, no diet designed for selected fish.
Waste Remediation Specialist
Identified types and sources of waste, very detailed

chart of ammonia/nitrate cycle, worked well with water chemist to select optimum filter equipment.

Identified types and sources
of waste,
a chart of ammonia/nitrate cycle, worked with chemist to select filter equipment.

Identified sources of waste, incomplete ammonia/nitrate cycle chart, selected filter equipment without water chemist consultation.

No waste sources identified, incorrect
chart of ammonia/nitrate cycle, improper or no selection of filter equipment.

Total _______  
   
17-20 points A
14-17 points B
11-14 points C
8-11 points D
< 8 points F
   
Grade ______  

A print-friendly version of this rubric is available on the Teacher Page.

Home || Introduction || Task || Process || Resources || Evaluation || Conclusion || Teacher Page