Social Science Models
Washington's Presidency: Materials
| 1. Stays in character throughout the conference. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 2. Demonstrates accurate knowledge of the issues that surround the debate. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 3. Provides a highly creative and unique synthesis of the information needed to portray the character. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 4. Clearly states a position and defends it with appropriate and sufficient evidence. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 5. Accurately reflects the positions that the assigned character would be likely to take. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 6. Asks knowledgeable questions that challenge other characters to defend their positions. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 7. Responds to arguments made by other participants. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 8. Expresses ideas clearly. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Description of Criteria Ratings:
5 = Exemplary: Goes beyond expectations to create original, highly insightful
work.
4 = Competent: Meets expectations. Work is accurate and thorough.
3 = Acceptable: Meets most expectations with only minor omissions or
inaccuracies.
2 = Needs Significant Improvement: Work has major omissions, inaccuracies.
1 = Unsatisfactory: Fails to meet minimal standards for quality work.