|
AUBURN
An Auburn
University agricultural economist delivered the decisive testimony in a $1.28
billion price-fixing verdict a federal court jury in Montgomery handed down
last week against beef-processing giant Tyson Foods.
Testifying as an expert
witness for the plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit, Auburn's Robert Taylor
provided explicit evidence that Tyson Fresh Meats, formerly IBP Inc., used
contracts with a select few ranchers to create a captive supply of cattle
and thereby drive down the prices paid on the cash market to independent
cattle producers an average of 5.1 percent a year from 1994 through 2002.
In actual damages, that is a loss of about $40 on every fed steer or heifer
sold on the cash market by the 30,000 producers represented in the suit.
Taylor, the Alfa eminent
scholar in agricultural and public policy in AU's College of Agriculture,
based his statements under oath on exhaustive statistical analyses he conducted
on previously undisclosed internal financial records detailing the per-head
prices IBP/Tyson paid to independent producers over the course of almost
nine years.
In addition to providing
concrete evidence of the depressive effects of captive supplies on cattle
prices, Taylor's testimony also challenged claims by Tyson that captive-supply
marketing arrangements result in more efficient processing and higher-quality
beef.
"My extensive
analysis of over 1 million transactions showed that there were absolutely
no packing plant efficiencies associated with captive supply, and, more important,
that Tyson's captive cattle graded almost 10 percent less choice than cattle
bought on the open market," Taylor said.
The lawsuit, known
as Pickett v. Tyson/IBP Inc., was filed in1996 by six cattle owners
in Alabama, Kansas, Nebraska, Montana and South Dakota. The
plaintiffs contended that Tyson's practices were unfair, discriminatory and
anticompetitive and that they violated a part of antitrust law know as the
Packers and Stockyards Act. Congress passed that act in 1921 to break up
the collusive dominance of five major packing companies that controlled 40
percent of the cattle market.
Today, Taylor said,
Tyson and four other meatpackers control, not 40 percent, but 85 percent
of the slaughter market, up from 35 percent 20 years ago.
In 2002, Pickett
v. Tyson/IBP was granted class-action status, allowing 30,000 producers
who had sold to Tyson from 1994 through 2002 to join in. The trial began
Jan. 12 in Montgomery before U.S. District Judge Lyle Strom. The jury heard
closing arguments Feb. 10 and then deliberated four full days before unanimously
agreeing with the plaintiffs that Tyson/IBP used large supplies of cattle
illegally contracted outside the market to manipulate cattle prices.
The Tyson suit marked
Taylor's first experience as an expert witness in a court case, and it was
not a pleasant ride. During the course of the lawsuit and the trial, defense
attorneys repeatedly attacked Taylor's credentials, his analytic methods,
his statistics and his testimony, but Taylor did not waver.
"Every word of
my testimony was based on an extremely thorough and accurate evaluation of
all the data sets I could get my hands on," Taylor said.
The case is still
far from over. If the judge accepts the jury's verdict, the case will move
to a separate trial in which Strom must decide whether to severely restrict
Tyson's use of contractual arrangements and order the meatpacker to buy the
majority of its cattle on the open market. Tyson has said that if the judge
does not set aside the verdict, it will appeal.
Still, Taylor said
the verdict is a major victory for independent cattle farmers and ranchers
and for consumers because it is a giant step toward reestablishing competition
in the nation's cattle industry.
# #
#
CONTACT: Robert Taylor,
(334) 844-1957
News from:
AG COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING
Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station
Auburn University College of Agriculture
2 COMER HALL, AUBURN UNIVERSITY, AL 36849
334-844-4877 (PHONE) 334-844-5892 (FAX)
Jamie Creamer: jcreamer@auburn.edu
2/25/04
|