-------------------- N E W S R E L E A S E -------------------- Auburn University - University Relations (334) 844-9999 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 6/23/95 Janet McCoy AU, AUM AND UAB RESEARCHERS TO STUDY ALABAMA'S CHAIN GANGS AUBURN -- An Auburn University professor will be the principal researcher in a statewide effort to evaluate the effectiveness of Alabama's controversial new chain gang program for state convicts. The work by AU's Tamryn Etten, Paul Sharp of AU at Montgomery and Charles Lindquist of the University of Alabama at Birmingham could also assist officials in other states interested in establishing chain gangs. The research proposal, which has been submitted for funding to the National Institute of Justice, has been endorsed by Ron Jones, commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections. "This research could keep other jurisdictions that want to establish chain gang programs from reinventing the wheel," says Etten, an assistant professor in AU's Department of Sociology. "We hope to create a description of a model program that jurisdictions could follow." The researchers will create a description by evaluating how the Alabama program was originally conceived and implemented, according to the proposal. Etten says the research is needed because of the growing national attention and the political popularity of programs which get tough on crime. "The proposed research will show how the program could be improved and evaluate the humaneness and safety of chain gangs as a form of punishment in the U.S.," she says. The study will be conducted in three phases. In addition to a process evaluation, researchers will also conduct a historical review of chain gangs nationally and perform a systems review and needs assessment to see if the Alabama prison system information would support an empirical evaluation. Alabama in May became the first state to revive chain gangs as a form of punishment for state prisoners. "Since that time, the state Department of Corrections has been flooded with inquiries from jurisdictions interested in establishing their own chain gang programs," says Sharp, an associate professor of sociology at AUM. Etten says the process evaluation "will answer questions such as why the state decided to implement the program, and how it decided several practical matters such as the number of inmates to chain together; distance between inmates; type of chains and shackles to use; work structure in terms of location, tasks and hours; clothing and equipment to purchase; length of prisoner assignment for maximum specific deterrent benefit; classification and background of inmates to assign; safest and quickest shackling method; and means of tracking chain gang member's progress." The historical review will be done by Lindquist, who has conducted corrections research for more than 17 years. Sharp, who has worked extensively Jones, will coordinate meetings with research staff and help conduct the systems review. Etten and Sharp will work together to plan the future evaluation of the program's deterrent effect. At Jones' request, Sharp had already begun initial research to gauge the effectiveness of the chain gang program. "My research so far is preliminary, but the program has shown a decrease in the number of rules violations within the institutions," he said. Sharp says he believes inmates are better behaved because corrections officers now have a "new authority" and can threaten disciplinary action of a chain gang. # # # june95:AU-chaingangs CONTACT: Etten, 205/825-4420 or 334/844-2824; Sharp, 334/244-3672; or Lindquist, who will be in his office after July 5 at 205/934-2069.