Auburn University Senate Minutes

 

November 14, 2000

 

Broun Hall Auditorium

 

 

Absent: D. Norris, D. Bransby, J. Saye, M. El-Halwagi, S. Krishnamurti, R. Crocker, G. M. Watkins, G. Weaver, R. Paxton, S. Fuller, R. Britnell, CPT C. Hageman, LTC C. Buchanan.

 

Absent (Substitute): S. Bilgili (R. A. Voitie), S. Bannon (F. Kochan), J. Bannon (J. Owens).

 

The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m.

 

The minutes for the previous meeting were approved as posted. They can be found on the Senate web page at https://auburn.edu/administration/governance/senate/schedule.html

 

Announcements: 

A.     President’s Office: Provost William Walker

Auburn has been invited to join Phi Beta Kappa. Many months and years have gone into this effort; those who have worked to bring this about, particularly Linda Glaze, Joyce Rothschild, Dean Schneller, Dean Heilman, and the faculty of their colleges are to be commended. This is a major event in the history of this institution; thus, the Board of Trustees in their meeting last Friday passed a resolution commending the institution on their approved Phi Beta Kappa chapter.

 

Our consultants, Jim and Karen Nichols, whom we have obtained to help us in the area of assessment, particularly outcomes assessment, were on campus Thursday and Friday last week.  Their report was that we’ve done thus far a commendable job in getting things in order. They will be returning on February 15th. What we were to have had in place last week were the outcomes to be assessed, and on the 15th the means of assessment are due.  They were very impressed with our efforts so far; I urge you to pass this along to your colleagues and encourage them to continue their good work.

 

The Tenure and Promotion committee meetings are underway. We’ve already met 5 or 6 hours; hopefully our deliberations will be complete by the end of Fall semester. This will be ahead of schedule considering our usual progress in the past years. Our goal is to get this work done by the first of the year so we can make our recommendations to the President and he can get the results out as soon as possible.

 

We have appointed a Vice President for Student Affairs. Dr. Wes Williams, who is currently at the University of West Virginia, will come on staff around the first of the year.  John Fletcher and the entire staff at Student Affairs have done a super job handling this search process for the past several months. I hope you will take the time to congratulate those individuals from Student Affairs on a job well done.

 

Dr. Carl Hudson, Finance:  The means of assessment were due in February but we need to know about the budget because the different ways that you can assess learning outcomes requires money and some units need to know if money will be provided or if it will come out of unit budgets. 

 

Dr. Walker:  I have given Dr. Large a budget for assessment as well as for the SACS accreditation. I do not know whether the money has been moved or not, but there will be money there. I think we put in for the Director of Assessment  about $100,000.

 

Dr. Hudson:  When will the individual units know what money is available?

 

Dr. Walker:  I don’t know. We will appoint the Assessment Director at the beginning of the year; it will be up to them to disperse those funds.

 

Andy Redman, SGA-Senate Liaison:  At Friday’s Board of Trustees meeting they passed a resolution regarding Summer graduation.  What exactly was the resolution?

 

Dr. Walker:  The board said that we would have Summer graduation.

 

Dr. Carl Hudson, Finance:  Can you tell us the status of the search for the Dean of the College of Business?

 

Dr. Walker:  I’ve decided to postpone that search for a while. I apologize for not alerting the search committee of that.  With some of the things going on with the College of Business, it seems to me that it would be better to postpone that search.  I should have a decision on that by the middle of January. 

 

Dr. Renee Middleton, Counseling/Counseling Pyschology:  So we will have Summer graduations from here on out or just this Summer?

 

Dr. Walker:  My impression is that we will have Summer graduations every Summer.

 

Dr. Bruce Gladden, Senate Chair:  Mr. Spina did say we were in a transition.

 

Dr. Walker:  I presume that if we came to a Summer where only 25 students wanted to graduate, the board would reconsider that.  Right now I have no idea how many students will be enrolled, will want to graduate, etc.  Right now we are trying to estimate the budgets for Summer school; we have no background so it is a guessing game.

 

B.    Senate Chair: Dr. Bruce Gladden

I’d like to add my personal congratulations to everyone involved in the achievement of the chapter of Phi Beta Kappa at Auburn University, particularly to those mentioned by Dr. Walker:  Linda Glaze, Joyce Rothschild, and Deans Heilman and Schneller.  Certainly this is something that everyone at Auburn University can be proud of.

 

We are presently establishing a nominating committee for Senate officers for next year. That committee will be chaired by past-chair Jo Heath.  Send nominations for the new chair-elect and secretary elect to:

heathjw@auburn.edu or Jo Heath, Parker Hall.  Feel free to nominate yourself.  We would like to have lots of people to step forward and have lots of participation. The committee will be put together in early December, so it is not too early to begin that process.

 

I would like to thank all of you for forwarding the requests of the Administrator Evaluation committee to your Department Heads and Chairs.  We have received some valuable feedback from some of them. We appreciate you getting the word out to them.

 

Finally, I was pleased to know from a newspaper article in the Birmingham news that a group of about 20 trustees from Boards of Education representing every state university met with Governor Seigelman yesterday in Montgomery.  They were lobbying for more money for faculty raises, technology, and maintenance. This is in response to the State Education trust fund.  Board of Trustee members from Auburn included Mr. Jimmy Samford and Rep. Jack Venable. They were present trying to get a good cut of that trust fund for higher education.

 

Committee Reports:

A.     Calendar and Schedules committee – Dr. Christine Curtis

The calendar committee has been working diligently trying to adjust these calendars to meet all of our needs.  As of Friday, we will have a graduation for Summer 2001; the date being recommended is August 6.  Finals end on the 4th of August; the 6th would be an appropriate date for the graduation.  The calendar committee recommends that we establish that date for graduation.  Fall Semester will start on August 16, so we will have approximately 10 days between Summer graduation and the beginning of Fall semester. This date is not the beginning of classes, since we have many meetings and orientations scheduled before classes start.

 

On behalf of the calendar committee, I bring to you August 6th as the graduation date for Summer term and I make a motion that we adopt that date.

 

The motion was seconded and passed without dissent with a voice vote.

 

 

Secretary’s note:  In the following section, Dr. Curtis is referring to an email survey sent out to the Senators 2 weeks prior to this meeting.  The survey asked the Senators to rank 6 items in order of importance in determining the days for the Fall Semester calendar.  This information was used as a guide by the Calendar and Schedules committee during their deliberations.  The items the Senators ranked included:  75 day minimum; having the same number of types of days, ie, the same number of Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays; Fall break; one full day off before Thanksgiving; 2 dead days; and ending as early in December as possible.

 

The second item is the calendar for Fall semester 2001. One consideration none of us thought of the last time we discussed the calendar was that classes were actually scheduled to start on the 16th of August. With the transition to the semester we are changing our payroll date so that we start on the 16th of August rather than the 16th of September.  This would mean that if we started on this date we would be starting on the first day of the payroll, which would mean that we would not have any time for orientation of new faculty or students, or for coordinating classes and activities for the Fall semester.  Therefore, the calendar committee proposed that we take the calendar to the Senate and ask a number of different things.  I believe all of you received a request from us to give your opinion of what was important for the Fall semester.  Remember we have constraints in the Fall that we don’t necessarily have during the Spring, so in the Fall we’re trying to start a couple of days after the 16th so we can give those departments a chance to plan for the fall.  Secondly, we have our Thanksgiving break; thirdly, we have our traditional Christmas break.  So we asked that the Senate look at six different things.  Several years ago the Senate stated that it would like to have 75 days of class in each semester. The students have since requested that they have a fall break.  They did a study and a number of schools do have a fall break. Another issue that has come up over the years is that we used to have a half-day of class the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. This usually skewed things because of low attendance unless we scheduled a test or something, because students who lived four hours away or further did not have much of a chance to get home unless they skipped class on Wednesday morning. We are ending later in December with the semester system than we traditionally did with the quarter system; the question is how late are we willing to end in December. Another issue that has come up is trying to keep the number of types of days (Mondays, Tuesdays, etc.) equivalent with holidays, the Fall break, etc. The last thing we asked you to look at is having two study days before Final exams at the end of the semester. 

 

The Senate then responded and we had a number of comments.  Many gave some very interesting perspectives and good ideas to the calendar committee.  Of the rankings, 43% of the Senators rated 75 class days as the number one priority. Number 2 priority was 38% of the Senators responding that they would like to have the same number of days of each day of the week.  The third priority was Wednesday off before Thanksgiving. The fourth priority was even between having a fall break and ending as early as possible in December.  The last item, two study/reading days, did not really rank. The calendar committee discussed all these issues. John Fletcher made an interesting comment, saying we couldn’t go too deep into December if we expect grades to be mailed before Christmas break. If you remember, in the last several years we’ve had a fairly long Christmas break; I don’t know how much you’ve enjoyed it, but I’ve enjoyed it thoroughly.  This year our last day here is the 18th of December, while graduation is the 16th; thus, we really only have a couple of days after grades are in to get those grades out. 

 

The calendar committee looked at all the issues and priorities and made the following suggestions, resulting in this proposed calendar:

 

Proposed Fall 2001 Calendar

 

2001 Fall Semester (74 Days)

 

August 17                   Orientation for new students

August 20                   Classes begin

September 3             Labor Day Holiday

October 10                 Mid semester (37th day)

October 15-16           Fall Break

November 21-25       Thanksgiving Holidays

December 7              Classes end

December 8-9           Study/Reading Days (formerly "dead days")

December 10-14      Final Exams

December 15            Graduation

 

 

The 17th is a Friday and is suggested as an orientation for new students. Starting classes on Monday rather than Tuesday prevents us chopping up another week. This particular calendar chopped up the weeks the least; this is one reason the committee chose to present it. 

 

The students who came to the Calendar and Schedules committee last Spring felt very strongly about the Fall break.  The student serving on the committee voiced, after the poll, that it was something very important for the students, so the calendar committee felt that it was something we should give a try.

 

In accordance to the wishes expressed, the Calendar committee suggested that we not try the half-day on Wednesday.

 

Classes end on December 7; the Study/Reading days, December 8 and 9, are on Saturday and Sunday.

 

Finals week being December 10-14 and graduation following immediately on the 15th does put the Registrar’s office in a bit of a bind.  The cooperation of the faculty to get the grades in early would certainly be appreciated on their part, particularly in regards to graduating seniors. They were willing to give up the traditional day they have between finals and graduation, however.

 

The compromise that we have in this calendar is that it is 74 days. From the various comments, the committee felt that the Senators gave the committee enough latitude to move from 75 days to 74 days.  In the comments it was also indicated that 75 would be optimum, but 74 would be acceptable. The committee felt that looking at the various parameters, this is the best we could come up with.

 

On behalf of the committee I move that the Senate suspend its rule to require 75 class days in each semester and allow for Fall 2001 to have 74 days, based on the analysis that has been done.

 

Dr. Gladden: This doesn’t require a second since it comes from a Senate committee.  Is there any discussion of this motion?

 

Adam Clayton, SGA rep. to Schedules and Calendar committee:  We feel that the Fall break is very important because we have entered into a period this semester where students are dragging their feet.  People are growing tired of taking classes, there have been a large number of course drops, and a growing number of people not attending classes. We feel that the fall break would alleviate these types of problems. I’d like to thank the Calendar and Schedules committee because I think they’ve done a great job addressing the needs of students and faculty with this calendar. On behalf of the SGA, I’d like to say that we are in full support of this calendar.

 

Dr. Curtis: Bruce said that I needed to clarify the motion.  The motion is to suspend the 75 days and allow the 74 days for Fall semester 2001 and approve the calendar that is displayed on the overhead.

 

Dr. Jo Heath, Immediate Past Chair:  Do you have  a count on the number of Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays this calendar has?

 

Dr. Curtis: There are three weeks that were broken.

 

Dr. Heath: How distorted is it?

 

Dr. Curtis: Labor Day is a Monday, the Fall break is a Monday and Tuesday, and Thanksgiving Holidays are Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday.

 

Dr. Heath: This calendar has five days for the Thanksgiving holidays.

 

Dr. Curtis: That includes the weekend.

 

Dr. Herb Rotfeld, Steering committee: When I heard some advance information that this calendar would include a fall break due to the students’ desires, I asked about other schools that had it and was quickly given a list.  I asked about what happened to the attendance during this week. Since we are going to have a half-week at Thanksgiving, I don’t think any teacher doubts what’s going to happen to their Monday and Tuesday attendance during that week. I was concerned that while the SGA says they want a fall break, I don’t know what they think will happen in the days around it.  I was fortunate enough to randomly be in touch with various faculty at different institutions whom I asked about this fall break. I always received the same answer: forget it.  In the days surrounding it the attendance plummets. You lose a lot of work the week of Thanksgiving and the week of the Fall break. I talked to a number of graduate students here who were familiar with the fall break at other institutions and they said the same thing. Don’t you think we are losing two weeks here?

 

Dr. Curtis: I have no answer. I haven’t done that analysis. Are there any members of the committee from last year here who may have done that analysis? Anyone with experience from other schools? We are losing a week of days, but what you are saying is that we will lose another week consisting of the days surrounding those breaks. I understand but do not have an answer.

 

Dr. Bob Locy, Biological Sciences:  I think there are actually two issues involved here. One is the issue of having the same number of days, but the other issue is the number of times you break. For example, in Biological Sciences where we have large laboratory class loads that meet virtually every day of the week from 8 in the morning until 6 or after at night. We set the labs up for the week and tear them down the weekend.  When we lose a Monday and Tuesday, basically, we can’t have labs Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday.  So essentially, two breaks costs us two or three weeks of labs. So I do not see such a problem with the number of days we have class as with the number of times we must break class. Combining the fall break with the Thanksgiving break serves Herb’s need and my need since I have students coming to me already wondering if they’re going to miss anything important in class if they are not there this Tuesday.  I’d like to propose to amend your motion and move the Fall break to the beginning of the week of the Thanksgiving break.

 

The motion was seconded.

 

Dr. Locy:  I would also like to add that I would be prepared to look at any information that the SGA or any other body could give me to help me be better informed when I vote on this motion.  I would like to see information supporting the benefits of a fall break for students and faculty alike.

 

Dr. Gladden: Just to clarify, you are proposing to eliminate the Fall break and have a full week at Thanksgiving?

 

Dr. Locy: Yes.

 

Adam Clayton, SGA rep. to Schedules and Calendar committee: I do not have any information regarding the attendance. I do have this list from other schools regarding their breaks. As you can see from this overhead, LSU is the only school that does not have any type of break.  All of these SEC schools have some type of break.  To argue the case against students missing class, we see it two ways:  one, it is to their own detriment. They can miss class but it is their problem.  Second has to do with the number of class days.  With 74 or 75 class days per semester we have an average of 148 or 148 days. On the quarter system we have averaged 142 class days. If we did approve this calendar, this would be 6 to 7 more class days per academic year than in previous years.

 

Andy Redman, SGA-Senate Liaison: I would like to speak against this amendment. I do not have any statistics or evidence to back myself up, just my own perspective. Obviously the SGA supports a Fall break. The discussion was whether or not a fall break would lead to more class days missed. Perhaps this is my own personal opinion because I am used to the quarter system, but right now I am ready for a break. I am ready to go home and see my mom. I know this is not statistical data, but a lot of the people I’ve talked to feel the same way. I think that because there has not been a break many students have been more likely to skip classes. Of course there has not been a study on that, but  I think a Fall break would actually help class attendance. I think the Fall break is obviously supported by the students and urge you to vote against this amendment.

 

Dr. Curtis: Herb, there was one thought that came to my mind. When we met with the University of Tennessee during the semester transition, they were the ones who introduced the concept of Fall break to us. They indicated that when they started they did not have it, but that faculty were the ones to indicate that they needed it and that they felt it was beneficial.

 

Dr. Dennis DeVries, Fisheries and Allied Aquaculture: It seems to me there are two issues, one the issue of laboratories and the other the issue of students skipping class. It seems to me that if a break is made available to them, then whether they come to class or not is up to them. I would like to hear more from other institutions that have that same problem of missing an entire week because of a partial break. 

 

Dr. Bill Hames, Geology and Geography:  He was sympathetic to those units that had labs and understood how broken weeks were disruptive to teaching those labs.

 

Dr. Andreas Illies, Chemistry: I think that my Department Head, Howard Hargis, would second that. I support the idea of a Fall break, but I think it really means that there would be one less lab. If the faculty could live with that, then it would be okay.

 

Dr. Renee Middleton, Counseling and Counseling Psychology: I just wanted to get a better sense of the word “difficult.” Does difficult mean impossible? Is it possible? I don’t understand what “difficult” means, because a lot of things are difficult but we still do them.

 

Dr. Bill Hames, Geology and Geography: There are certain labs that we feel compelled to teach our students.  However, under the semester system we will drop some labs that are designed to go along with certain lectures or topics.

 

Dr. Steve Knowlton, Physics: To answer your question, I think it is difficult, but it is one of the prices you pay for having a Fall break. 

 

Dr. Bob Locy, Biological Sciences: Kind of like Steve was saying, we could accommodate one break, maybe stretch and accommodate two breaks by designing something that is a little more flexible. When you start breaking the semester three or four times, it is impossible to take back much of what you normally do in labs. In our case, since we have so many lab sessions we must teach, we start first thing Monday morning and go until last thing on Friday night. We can’t set something up for part of the week.

 

Adam Clayton, SGA rep. to Schedules and Calendar committee: Students started coming to me in the middle of October letting me know how tired and frustrated they were with school and no break. I feel as though if we wait to give a full week at Thanksgiving, students will still be like they are now. They will be dragging their feet and class attendance will be down. I do not have any evidence or data to show that class attendance will increase if we have a Fall break, but I personally feel that it will. The four-day weekend in October will give students a chance to go to the beach, go see their family, or stay here in Auburn and catch up on school work if they need to. I feel that if we wait longer, until Thanksgiving, it will prolong this period of tiredness where no one is attending class and academic work is being sacrificed.

 

Dr. Bob Locy, Biological Sciences:  From my point of view as an instructor, if you give me two days off in the middle of the week it is just dragging the semester out even further. Second, are your sources mostly freshman, sophomores, or others, because those familiar with the quarter system are most likely not used to semesters and might find it more difficult than the freshman who only knows semesters. I teach mostly freshman so I do not get a sense of what you are talking about.

 

Mr. Clayton: I feel that giving a four-day weekend would allow time for students to recuperate. The standard Fall now is week after week after week of the same routine. This break would give them a chance to relax and come back; it is almost like a mini-spring break. About the types of people coming to talk to me, I’ve had all types including freshman, sophomores, juniors, seniors, grad students, and faculty especially.

 

Dr. Curtis: One of the comments that came through was that it is very difficult for some faculty, particularly single parents for the school system to have a day off when we don’t. Their point was that a number of classes would be cancelled those days as well since there’s nothing to do with the children.

 

Dr. Paul Schmidt, Mathematics:  Personally I have no strong opinion about a Fall break but I would like to tell you what the faculty in mathematics told me when I asked for their input.  I got very diverse, contradictory statements about a lot of these scheduling issues but there was unanimousity about one issue and that was the absurdity of a 2 day Fall break.  So although it has been said that not only the students but also the faculty suffer from the length of the Semester, that is certainly not the opinion of the faculty in mathematics. 

 

Dr. Gladden: Is there any further discussion? Are we prepared to vote on this amendment?

 

A vote on the amendment was taken by a show of hands. There were 34 in favor of the amendment and 17 opposed, so the amendment passed.

 

Dr. Curtis:  We will proceed with the calendar as amended with the Fall break no longer there; instead those two days have been added to the Thanksgiving break, giving a full week of holidays at Thanksgiving.

 

Dr. Alex Dunlop, English:  I have an angry email from a colleague concerning the problem with pay schedules. This is someone who is involved with training GTA’s at the beginning of the semester.  They are very concerned that there will not be enough time at the beginning of the semester to do this. I am simply passing on this complaint.

 

Dr. Curtis: This was discussed at length by the calendar committee. At this point we have four days, the 16th through the 19th, two of those days on the weekend. We did not have a good solution. The only way to accommodate a good solution would be to move the calendar deeper into December.

 

Dr. Dunlop: Could the fiscal day be moved up?

 

Dr. Curtis: The fiscal date goes from the 16th of August to the end of December, then from the beginning of January to the 15th of May. Summer term will be the 16th of May to the 15th of August. If you moved it up to August 1, then you’d have the trouble of overlap because of our graduation date on the 6th of August.  Then you would have trouble in May because the last pay check would be on April 30th and you wouldn’t be getting paid for those 15 days.

 

Dr. Jeff Facteau, Psychology:   Recording not interpretable

 

Dr. Curtis: One of the issues I understand to be a problem are the new GTA’s coming in, who would be finishing up somewhere else that summer. There is the same issue with new faculty.  There are multiple issues here.

 

Dr. Bruce Gladden:  Asked for a vote to approve the Fall calendar 2001 as amended. 

 

After a hand count vote, the motion passed and the calendar was approved by a vote of 38 in favor, 13 opposed.

 

Fall 2001 Calendar approved by the Senate:

 

2001 Fall Semester (74 Days)

 

August 17                   Orientation for new students

August 20                   Classes begin

September 3             Labor Day Holiday

October 10                 Mid semester (37th day)

November 19 - 25     Thanksgiving Holidays

December 7              Classes end

December 8 - 9         Study/Reading Days (formerly "dead days")

December 10 -14     Final Exams

December 15            Graduation

 

 

Dr. Mark Rolsma, Pathobiology: Seeing that this is the second Fall out of two in a row where we’ve had 74 days, it looks like we’re going to have a 74-day calendar no matter what. I move to enable the Calendar and Schedules committee to approve a 74- or 75-day, preferably 75-day, calendar without having to come back to the Senate for a waiver of this rule to always have a 75-day calendar.

 

The motion was seconded.

 

Dr. Gladden: We have a motion to allow the Calendar and Schedules committee to have a Fall/Spring semester calendar that would be preferably 75 days, but could be 74 days, without seeking Senate approval.  Is there any discussion?

 

Dr. Jo Heath, Immediate Past Chair: We do still approve the schedule?

 

Dr. Gladden: Yes. This is a motion not to require specific waiving of the 75 days.

 

Dr. Herb Rotfeld, Steering Committee: First of all, since we have to approve every calendar, they’re not really asking for a waiver every time, they’re just asking for approval as part of the calendar. Secondly, after talking with the chair of the Calendar committee, he said we ended up with 74 this time and last because of the way the dates fell on the calendar and certain issues with working it out. Thirdly, I’ve heard from a number of people at different times about the 75-day requirement and how it gets in the way of other things they want to do. I think it would be really nice to accommodate these people who want fewer days to work throughout the course of the semester. Lastly, one reason I consider the 75-day calendar an important thing deals with something that came to us from the Board of Trustees.  After having spent three fun-filled years on the Curriculum committee during transition and going through every curriculum program on this campus, we dealt with a certain restriction that was imposed by the Board of Trustees: all of our programs be such that students can complete them in four years. What this meant in some instances is that we had ceilings on some of the courses that were going through.  We had a number of programs that came in and said that lowering the number of credits required would considerably lessen the credibility of their curriculum.  When we were on quarters I did a study on the number of days and the number of days steadily decreased.  I don’t won’t to start doing that now on the semester system.

 

Dr. Gladden:  Any other comments?  OK, if there is no other discussion, we will vote. 

 

The motion was passed by a voice vote.

 

Dr. Gladden:  I would like to thank all of you for providing feedback on the calendar.  This is always a difficult task for that committee, so I appreciate you helping out.

 

The meeting was adjourned at 4:15 p.m.