Pseudorinelepis Bleeker, 1858

Pseudorinelepis genibarbis, Photo by K.S. Cummings



TAXA LIST
Only one species of four described species of Pseudorinelepis (P. genibarbis) is recognized by Armbruster and Hardman, 1999.  The following is an excerpt from Armbruster and Hardman (1999).  See also Armbruster (1998) and Armbruster and Page (1997) for more details on Pseudorinelepis.


GENUS SYNONYMY

Pseudorinelepis Bleeker 1862: 3, type species: Rhinelepis genibarbis Valenciennes 1840.
Canthopomus Eigenmann 1910: 404, 407, type species: Rhinelepis genibarbis Valenciennes 1840.
Monistiancistrus Fowler 1939: 236-237, Fig. 26-27, type species: Monistiancistrus carachama Fowler 1939.



SPECIES


NEOTYPE

MZUSP 52897 (1), Brazil, Amazonas, lago Castro do Rio Purus.



OTHER SPECIMENS EXAMINED

Brazil, Amazonas: FMNH 95569 (1), FMNH 95570 (1cs), MZUSP 6339 (4, 1cs), and ZMA 107.858 (3), same data as neotype.  Brazil, Rondônia, ZMA 119.401 (1), small pool on Rio Jamari near confluence with Rio Madeira just below Samuel Hydroelectric.  Brazil, Roraima: ZMA 120.102 (1), Rio Branco, Marará, floodplain lake (Lago Central).  Peru, Loreto: BMNH 18035 (1), Cashiboya; CAS 42325 (1), Quebrada Yaguas Yacu near Pebas; CAS 58801 (1), Iquitos; IIAP 114 (6), Río Samiria (Caño Ungurahui); IIAP uncataloged (2), Tacshacocha, Río Samiria- Río Marañon drainage; INHS 36938 (5, 1cs), Río Amazonas, at Pueblo Gallito; INHS 36941 (1), Felipe Cocha (Río Itaya), 12 km S Iquitos on road to Quistococha near the community of 29 Enero 1995; INHS 39730 (5, 1cs), Ushpa and Moena Caños, Río Itaya - Río Amazonas drainage, 1.73 miles NNE Iquitos.  Peru, Ucayali: ZMA 107.867 (1), Coronel Portillo Prov., Río Ucayali basin, Cashiba Cocha.  Peru, department unknown: IIAP uncataloged (1), Cocha Vainilla, Supay - Río Ucayali drainage.



DIAGNOSIS

Pseudorinelepis and, hence, P. genibarbis was diagnosed by the following synapomorphies by Armbruster (1998a): an enlarged posterior shelf of the fourth epibranchial; a well-developed lateral ridge on the quadrate; a wide, flat parasphenoid; well-developed ridges on the pterotic-supracleithrum (taller than in other loricariids); a wide ventrolateral strut of the coracoid that is wholly exposed (supporting odontodes directly); passage of the arrector ventralis muscle of the pectoral girdle through a channel; and elongate, nonevertible cheek odontodes.  Of these, only the wide, flat parasphenoid is unique among loricariids to Pseudorinelepis. genibarbis



DESCRIPTION

Largest specimen examined male, 356.2 mm SL (ZMA 120.102).  A large, bulky loricariid with strongly keeled lateral plates that have well-developed ridges of bone and odontodes above and below the keels.  Head relatively short when compared to the related Rhinelepis (head depth to head length ratio 59.1-78.0% vs. 47.0-59.0%; Armbruster & Page, 1997).  Pectoral fins relatively short (spine when folded ventral to pelvic fin extending from just prior to pelvic spine to slightly overlapping it).  In large juveniles and adults, abdomen completely encased in plates as is small area just above pelvic fins.  Lateral plates thick.  Adipose fin and raised, median pre-adipose plate absent.  Caudal peduncle roughly circular in cross-section.  Teeth bifid; long and thin with small cusps.  Tooth number increases with body size (Fig. 1).  Small papilla present in middle of buccal cavity.  As in other members of Rhinelepis group, anus close to anal fin, separated only by small plate; eye simple, lacking dorsal flap of iris that makes eye appear bilobed in most other loricariids.  Dorsal fin II 7 (one specimen has additional, incomplete ray between posterior two, complete rays), pectoral fin I 6, pelvic fin I 5, anal fin I 5, caudal fin I 14 I.  Lateral line plates 23-26 (25), plates under base of dorsal fin 6-7 (7), plates in depressed dorsal fin 11-14 (12), postdorsal plates 12-15 (14), postanal plates 8-12 (12), teeth 23-62 per jaw ramus.



COLORATION

Color patterns are variable and Pseudorinelepis genibarbis can change color to match substrate.  Most specimens preserved in alcohol are brown to charcoal gray with few if any spots (generally restricted to dorsal-fin membranes).  In life, Pseudorinelepis may be completely dark brown to black; mottled with tan to dark brown background and black streaks; or light tan with large, sparse spots located at base of lateral plates, on fin membranes, and on abdomen.   Armbruster & Page (1997) suggest that breeding males develop orange coloration along cheek margin and dorsal- and caudal-fin spines, but the orange coloration may be restricted to specimens from the Rio Branco.

Sexual dimorphism.  Males have longer odontodes on the cheek that are more dense and numerous than in females; males may also have orange on the cheeks and dorsal- and caudal-fin spines.



COMPARISONS

Pseudorinelepis genibarbis can be distinguished from all other hypostomines and ancistrines by a combination of the absence of an adipose fin, a simple eye without a dorsal flap of the iris (vs. dorsal flap of iris present making the eye appear bilobed); 5 branched anal-fin rays (vs. 4 in Hypostomus and Pterygoplichthys); a single medium-sized plate posterior to the pterotic-supracleithrum (vs. many small plates or no plates in some loricariids); a patch of non-evertible, elongate odontodes on the cheek, well-developed ridges on the pterotic-supracleithrum (vs. ridges not as well-developed); and well-keeled lateral plates.  See also Armbruster & Page (1997).

Pseudorinelepis genibarbis differs from all other members of the Rhinelepis group by the presence of tall ridges on the pterotic-supracleithrum, keeled lateral plates, and a coracoid strut that is completely exposed.  In addition, Pseudorinelepis can be distinguished from Pogonopoma by the lack of an adipose fin, a completely plated abdomen, and a larger head depth/SL ratio (20.0-26.0% vs. 16.1-19.8%); from Pogonopomoides by the presence of elongate cheek odontodes in adults, a completely plated abdomen, and the following morphometric features: a smaller snout length/SL ratio (13.8-17.6% vs. 17.6-19.3%), a larger thorax length/SL ratio (25.8-31.7% vs. 18.9-23.3%), a larger head depth/SL ratio (20.0-26.0% vs. 15.5-19.0%), and a larger cleithral width/SL ratio (27.5-32.1% vs. 23.3-27.5%); and from Rhinelepis by the presence of elongate cheek odontodes in adults, lack of a plate between the pterotic-supracleithrum and the exposed opercle, small (vs. large) gill openings, and the following morphometric features: a smaller snout length/SL ratio (13.8-17.6% vs. 21.0-24.3%), a smaller interorbital width/SL ratio (12.4-16.6% vs. 18.2-19.4%), a larger thorax length/SL ratio (25.8-31.7% vs. 15.1-20.7%), a larger postanal length/SL ratio (20.6-31.0% vs. 20.3-24.1%), and a larger dorsal fin spine length/SL ratio (23.6-34.2% vs. 18.5-22.9%).  See also Armbruster (1998a).



COMMENTS

In Iquitos, Peru, Pseudorinelepis genibarbis is often referred to as carachama sin costilla, which means loricariid without ribs.  This refers to one of the diagnostic characters of the Rhinelepis group, a lack of ribs beyond the enlarged rib of the sixth vertebral centrum (Armbruster, 1998a).



DISTRIBUTION

From Brazil and Peru, in the Amazon River and its major tributaries (Rios Madeira and Negro in Brazil and Ríos Marañon, Napo, and Ucayali in Peru; see below).  Based on specimens examined and personal observation, Pseudorinelepis genibarbis is typically found in small sluggish streams, floodplain lakes, and large rivers.


The question mark refers to a potentially introdcued poipulation of Rhinelepis.



LITERATURE CITED

Armbruster, J.W. and L.M. Page. 1997. Generic reassignments of the loricariid species Monistiancistrus carachama Fowler 1940, Plecostomus lacerta Nichols 1919, and Rhinelepis levis Pearson 1924 (Teleostei: Siluriformes). Copeia 1997:227-232.

Armbruster, J.W. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of the suckermouth armored catfishes of the Rhinelepis group (Loricariidae: Hypostominae). Copeia 1998:620-636.

Armbruster, J.W. and M. Hardman. 1999. Redescription of Pseudorinelepis genibarbis (Loricariidae: Hypostominae) with comments on behavior as it
relates to air-holding. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 10:53-61.


  • TOP


  • If you have any comments or questions regarding this site, please contact Jon Armbruster at armbrjw@mail.auburn.edu