Hypostominae Kner, 1853


Hypostomus hemiurus, photo by M.H. Sabaj
TAXA LIST


The Hypostominae has long been recognized as a monophyletic unit.  Armbruster (2004) restricts the subfamily in the sense that Pareiorhaphis, Kronichthys,and Pareiorhina are placed into the Neoplecostominae and Delturus and Hemipsilichthys in their own subfamily to be described, but expands the subfamily in the sense that the genera of the Ancistrinae are returned to the Hypostominae. It is the largest subfamily of the Loricariidae with 31 genera, 447 nominal species (379 valid; as of 9 January 2006). The number of species represent 53% of all loricariids.  Below are links to the five tribes that make up the Hypostominae. Descriptive and diagnostoic infomation for the subfamily is also available (GO TO DESCRIPTION).


TAXA TABLE
 

TRIBE
GENUS
ADDITIONAL GENERA
IN SYNONYMY
ANCISTRINI    
  Acanthicus  
  Ancistrus Xenocara
    Pristiancistrus
    Thysanocara
  Baryancistrus  
  Chaetostoma Hypocolpterus
    Lipopterichthys
  Cordylancistrus  
  Dekeyseria Zonancistrus
  Dolichancistrus  
  Exastilithoxus  
  Hemiancistrus Ancistomus
  Hemiancistrus landoni  
  Hopliancistrus  
  Hypancistrus  
  Lasiancistrus  
  Leporacanthicus  
  Leptoancistrus  
  Lithoxus Paralithoxus
  Megalancistrus  
  Neblinichthys  
  Panaque Panaqolus
Scobinancistrus
  Parancistrus  
  Peckoltia Peckoltichthys
Sophiancistrus
  Pseudacanthicus  
  Pseudancistrus Lithoxancistrus
Guyanancistrus
Pseudolithoxus
  Spectracanthicus Oligancistrus
CORYMBOPHANINI    
  Corymbophanes  
HYPOSTOMINI    
  Hypostomus Aphanotorulus
  Cheiridodus
Cochliodon
    Isorineloricaria
  Squaliforma
  Watawata
PTERYGOPLICHTHINI    
  Hemiancistrus annectens group  
  Pterygoplichthys Glyptoperichthys
    Liposarcus
RHINELEPINI    
  Pogonopoma  Pogonopomoides
  Pseudorinelepis Canthopomus
    Monistiancistrus
  Rhinelepis  
TRIBE
GENUS
ADDITIONAL GENERA
IN SYNONYMY



DIAGNOSIS

Hypostominae is diagnosed by one unique characteristic: lower lobe oof the hypural plate longer than upper (123:1). Other characteristics that are considered synapomoprhic for the Hypostominae are: a long accessory process on the first ceratobranchial )7:2, reversed in some groups), a small canal plate (83: 1), a V-shaped spinelet (148: 0), and a posteroventral ridge on the basipterygium (173: 1)



DESCRIPTION

With the exclusion of some genera formerly in Hypostominae but the inclusion of Ancistrinae, Hypostominae becomes the largest of the loricariid subfamilies in number of species (~360 currently valid species) and genera 3040).  Size is incredibly variable within the subfamily including small members such as Lithoxus (50 mm) and the largest of all loricariids, Rhinelepis and Acanthicus (1000+ mm).  Hypostomines are typically bulkier than other loricariids and generally have thicker plates than neoplecostomines.  The tribe and generic descriptions provide more information on the diversity of forms.



COMPARISONS

The best character to distinguish the Hypostominae from most other loricariids is the development of the spinelet.  In all the Hypostominae, the spinelet is large and V-shaped and clearly slides under the nuchal plate whereas it is square or absent in most other loricariids and, when present, does not slide under the nuchal plate.  Some hypoptopomatines have a triangular spinelet, but these species can be distinguished from the Hypostominae by a completely or nearly completely exposed pectoral girdle (vs. at most some odontodes supported by the coracoid laterally), and by having the fenestrae of the pterotic-supracleithrum larger ventrally than dorsally (vs. all fenestrae of about equal size).  Delturus also has a triangular spinelet but can be distinguished by the presence of an adipose fin with a postdorsal ridge of median plates (all hypostomines with a postdorsal ridge lack an adipose fin).  Chaetostoma, Cordylancistrus, Dolichancistrus, Leptoancistrus\, and some Ancistrus have the spinelet covered in skin; these species can be separated from the other loricariid subfamilies by the presence of evertible cheek plates with hypertrophied odontodes.  Hypostominae further differs from Lithogenes by being completely plated; and from Loricariinae by having a round, oval, or triangular cross-section of the caudal peduncle (vs. rectangular and depressed).



LITERATURE CITED

Armbruster, J.W. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of the suckermouth armored catfishes (Loricariidae) with emphasis on the Hypostominae and the Ancistrinae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 141:1-80.


  • TOP