1. When is the second field project report due? May 3, 2004

2. What should the report include? The style of each report will vary according to each student’s
specific area; however, each report should at a minimum include the following:

     •    purpose and/or need for the project
     •    actions/steps taken to carry out the project
     •    results (to date)
     •    how project is expected to impact (a) the employment of people with disabilities; (b) your
          skill level; and (c) your place of employment
     •    a statement of your time commitment (hours spent)

3. What about APA format? Since APA writing style was not reviewed in our on-campus class,
we will be lenient in this requirement. However, you should (a) double-space; (b) use 12 point font;
and (c) give appropriate credit to any references you use. You may want to note the manner in which
references are cited in the articles in your on-line text, Introduction to Community Employment
Services. 

4. What documentation should I include with my report? As a general rule, include
documentation which clearly demonstrates the work you have done. For example, if the purpose of
your project was to develop a PASS plan, you would need to include a copy of the actual plan. If
your project was to develop marketing materials, you will most likely need to submit a copy of your
actual marketing tool (brochure, video, etc...) or a draft of your work. Other examples of
documentation include: surveys, curriculum documents, minutes of meetings, etc. (Remember to
protect the confidentiality of consumer information.)

5. How will my field project be graded?  The areas that will be assessed are:

     •    Is the purpose and/or need of the project clearly described?
     •    Are the steps/actions/plans described in sufficient detail?
     •    Is the project expected to benefit the student, the student’s organization, and individuals with
          disabilities?
     •    Is the project well thought out and organized?
     •    Is the documentation included sufficient to give a “picture” of the project?
     •    Is the project report neat and free of grammatical/spelling errors?